Of course we know that the truth about the crash of flight MH17, in July 2014 over Ukraine, forever to remain under the carpet.
The way that plays cover-Netherlands game is actually pretty smart. Regardless of completely disrespectful or any sense of duty, of course.
After extensive and baseless media smear campaign to Russia, led by the former NSB propaganda cannon Telegraph, we are now entering a time that the people and of course the relatives, ever want to see something concrete.
Of course, that there is not in the desired shape, simply because it does not exist, so a tactic is determined in order to derive the further attention. Than that in the form of the AIVD happens (general intelligence and security service) that would withhold information and would not really work with the Public Prosecutor in charge of tracking down the perpetrators.
In the NIS in an extensive article on this situation:
In particular, the attitude of the intelligence service AIVD calls the police and some of the OM much annoyance. The prosecution and the police to track down and having to seek information from the AIVD. But the secret service frustrates research in the eyes of some of the prosecution and police constantly, invoking laws and regulations.
That the AIVD withholds information, research very difficult, said the sources. Within the research team, one wonders how motivated or politics is really to bring the perpetrators to justice. Officials argue that politics increasingly strong interest in ensuring that there is no criminal case against those responsible.
There have, of course, absolutely right involved in because it was from day one never intended that the real culprits would be caught in the collar.
The purpose why flight MH17 is shot out of the air is reached. That goal was next to an occult blood sacrifice, further demonizing Russia and ensure that Europe finally behind America stood with regard to sanctions and "forward".
If the purpose is achieved, you want the way, as soon as possible fades into the background. In that respect, Netherlands extinguisher country par excellence. If you want to exit a case, the examination by the Netherlands and success is guaranteed.
And so they do it very cleverly by getting a vague body with it as the AIVD that the investigation would frustrate. A club that falls under Minister Plasterk ignoramus so you're guaranteed to them that there will be so many confusing things out that no one sees the forest for the trees anymore. The Prosecution would obviously love to catch the perpetrators in the collar, but unfortunately, their hands are tied.
Then the NIS will then an unpardonable error in the way deliberately, in their article:
"The research findings point in one direction. The MH17 is brought down by a Buk missile, which is fired from a Russian installation by highly probable Russian military. The Buk-installation transported shortly before the disaster from Russia to Ukraine. This is evident from various movies that have surfaced on the Internet. "
This piece baseless propaganda media in Ukraine have been led to publish widely, according to a message from the Dutch NOS the prosecution Russians finds responsible for the downing of flight MH17 with Buk missile.
Although they do not splash proof that the plane was shot down by a Buk missile and although they admit the truth probably never in this case is on the table and, while they admit that it probably takes more advantage by not guilty dragging for a judge. Despite all the NIS could write not let a criminal article, which again explicitly Russia blamed.
For people who are interested in how flight MH17 actually from the air is shot, there has recently been an interesting analysis appeared on the popular blog Colonel Cassad.
The report shows that flight MH17 can not be shot by a Buk missile from the air. That there is evidence that the Malaysia Airlines Boeing's first hit by 23 and / or 30 mm machine gun fire from an SU-25 fighter plane M1.
That the pilots died after the first attack, there is a great decompression occurred in the unit, the electronics not (properly) longer worked, the plane made a sharp turn and that when it was again attacked by the SU-25 M1.
That this time it was shot with an R-60 air-to-air missile and that countless evidence of this in the wreckage are found. This story is broadly in line with what other aviation experts say, as the German Peter Haisenko.
The only difference is that Haisenko think there was first attacked on the left and a left turn was made and Colonel Cassad thinks there first right was attacked by the SU-25 M1 and that a turn was made right.
Anyone who wants to do research, we recommend reading the report of Colonel Cassad. This can be done via the website or a PDF.
Studies and analyzes of Cassad and Haisenko that are substantiated. Explaining why they say something and demonstrate that they do not just happen. Investigations thousand times more valuable than the juggling that is called in the Netherlands study.
http://www.niburu.co/index.php?option=c … ;Itemid=33
