Добавлено: 16.10.2015, 11:10
ну такие уж крошечные - да они (в масштабе с иллюминатором) поболее будут малазийских. А одна дыра так вообще огромадная.
These are not our words, but those of a former deputy of America who worked with President Reagan to end the Cold War.
According to Paul Craig Roberts is the Dutch report as useless as the report of the 9/11 Commission.
When we write that the investigation into the disaster MH17 is a farce which advance the conclusions were established, that's one thing. When someone such as Paul Craig Roberts says, a man who worked closely with former US President Reagan to end the Cold War, then that is something else entirely.
This is what Roberts has to say:
When I read that the investigation regarding the tearing down of the Malaysian passenger aircraft was in the hands of the Dutch, I knew it would be done no research and no attention should be paid to details.
That turned out to be.
I was not going to write because the propaganda of Washington has already succeeded in their aim to lay the blame on Russia on this report. However, the misinterpretation of this report by some media outlets like NPR is so crazy and it turns out that the media make the story and not the report.
For example, I just heard the correspondent for NPR (National Public Radio) in Moscow, Corey Flintoff. This told us that the missile had hit the plane was fired by rebels in eastern Ukraine who did not have the technical knowledge to operate this system. Therefore, the missile must be fired by the Russians.
There is nothing in the Dutch research leading to this conclusion. Flintoff is either completely incompetent or he's lying or he gives his opinion and not the report's conclusion.
The only conclusion which the report might come is one that we already knew. As a BUK-aircraft missile shot down than it was a missile produced by Russia. The report does not say who fired the missile.
No fault in the report is given to Russia, but it criticizes Ukraine for not closing their airspace above a war zone. Commenting on the report, lawyers have already announced that both the families of the victims and Malaysia Airlines itself likely will file claims to Ukraine.
Of course there was none of this in the report of Flintoff.
As I wrote at the time of the shooting down of the plane, the Western media had their story "The Russians did it" already ready at the moment it was announced that a plane was shot down.
This story Washington was very good to put extra pressure on their vassal states in Europe to impose sanctions against Russia, since about a lot of hesitation arose. What has never been interpreted by Washington and never been asked by the Western media is: "What motives did the separatists and Russia to shoot a Malaysian plane out of the sky? None.
The Russian government would never allow such an action. Putin would be those who would have been responsible to immediately hang up the highest lamppost.
The story of Washington is not credible. Only a fool would believe this.
What motive had Washington? The demonization of Russia made it impossible for European countries to resist any longer against economic sanctions that Washington wants to bring an action against Russia to break the political and economic relationship between Europe and Russia.
Is the Russian manufacturer of the BUK-missile proved that if there is a BUK-missile used, this is an older type should be that is only used by the Ukrainian army. For years the Russian military has an alternative version that leaves another "signature" at the site of the explosion.
The damage to the Malaysian aircraft does not comply with the destructive power of the BUK system as used by the Russian army. These reports were handed over to the Dutch, but there is no attempt made by them to verify these results. Indeed, the report does not even take into account the possibility that the unit may be knocked down by a military jet.
This report is as useless as the report of the 9/11 Commission.
Do not expect the Western media will ever admit this. A collection of people who lie to make a living.
The reason that there is no future for the West because the West does not have a media, only propaganda guns for the government and the corporate agenda. Every day the bought and paid media maintains the matrix through which the West politically impotent.
The Western media has no independence. An editor of a major German newspaper has written a bestseller, in which he states that he has acted only as an accomplice of the CIA through the preservation of the lies of Washington, but almost every journalist in Europe does the same.
Naturally, his book was never released in America.
As someone who, together with President Reagan has worked to bring an end to the Cold War and the associated nuclear threat, I am dismayed to note that the Western media have lost their lives on earth in the lurch again the possibility of a nuclear Armageddon boot.
So far, Paul Craig Roberts.
Part of the message above Roberts on social media, make sure that politicians in The Hague the Netherlands will try and shake.
http://www.niburu.co/index.php?option=c … ;Itemid=50
